“There is not one verse in Scripture that the PRIESTHOOD as we know it, will be continued after Christ has rent the veil of the temple.” This is a comment of one person to a previous article about the Mass. He didn’t believe there was a New Testament priesthood. He believes the priesthood ended after the veil in the temple was torn in two. He doesn’t seem to realize, the tearing of the veil, in Mark 15, did not mark the end of the priesthood; it marked the end of Jesus life. “Jesus gave a loud cry and breathed his last. The veil of the sanctuary was torn in two from top to bottom (Mk 15:37-38). As you can see this was at the death of Jesus, not the death of the priesthood. He has quoted a verse and then substituted something that has nothing to do with the context.
Here is another person who objected to the Mass because we have priests offering it. “That is the catholic doctrine. Which is why I am glad I left the catholic church. This doctrine is severely un biblical and heretical. Gods word say …There is no need for a priest to make sacrifice over and over again.” In almost all objections against the Mass and priesthood there is usually at least a partial truth, followed by a distortion. When he says there is no need for a priest to make sacrifice over and over again; he is correct and in fact, he is alluding to this in the Bible; Every priest stands daily at his ministry offering frequently those same sacrifices that can never take away sins (Heb 10:11). His error is in not realizing this was the Old Testament priesthood, not the Catholic priesthood.
He wants us to believe that the priest spoken of is a New Testament Catholic priest, and the sacrifices that cannot take away sins are the Mass. Herein lies the problem; the priest in Hebrews 10:11 is a Levitical Old Testament priest and the sacrifices being offered are animal sacrifices, not the Mass. Without realizing it, he was taught Hebrews 10:11 out of context and believed it, not realizing someone had slipped one by him.
HEBREWS 10:11 TAKEN IN CONTEXT: “Every [Levitical, Heb 7:11] priest stands daily at his ministry offering frequently those same sacrifices [blood of bulls and goats, Heb 10:4] that can never take away sins. The only way that a Catholic priest could be in violation of Hebrews 10:11 would be if he offered animal sacrifice. But of course he doesn’t; he offers Jesus in every Mass.
Here is another of his comments, He believes that the Mass and the priesthood are wrong because to him it suggests in some way that “Christ's atonement was insufficient and is still going through a process of completion.” To back up his thesis, he quotes Christ, just before he died on the cross; “it is finished.” He doesn’t connect the dots. He doesn’t tell us why receiving Jesus, in the reenactment of the Last Supper (Mass), takes away from Christ’s one time sacrifice on the cross. He just makes the statement.
When Jesus said, it is finished; He wasn’t saying the Last Supper and priesthood were finished. He is saying His life and mission are completed (Jn 17:4). “When Jesus had taken the wine, he said, “It is finished.” And bowing His head He handed over His Spirit” (Jn 19:30). When Jesus said “it is finished,” he was not speaking against the end of the priesthood. It was the end of His life. Notice in the very next verse, Jesus dies. Jesus is the High Priest, and it would have been the end of the priesthood, had he not rose from the dead and ascended into Heaven. .
Furthermore, Paul tells us in Hebrews that there is a CHANGE OF PRIESTHOOD; "For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well" (Heb 7:12). The people who claim there is an end of the priesthood, seem not to be aware of the fact that the Bible claims only that there is a change of priesthood. These same people who claim the BIBLE ALONE are seemingly unaware of the fact that they are believing something that is not only, not in the Bible, but even contrary to the Bible. Since there is not an end of the priesthood but a change in priesthood in the Bible; this begs the question, where do they get this contrary notion? They are getting it from their tradition and by doing so they are in violation of their own Bible Alone doctrine.
The Last Supper, Priesthood, Confession, authority of the Church, honoring Mary and good works are in the Bible and it doesn’t say that any of these things take away from finished work of Christ on the cross. The second problem is that none of these things listed are in the context of John 19:30. We should not take the words of Christ “it is finished” and then use this to negate other things, not in the context. To do so is a corrupt presentation. This type of corrupt presentation is used against the Catholic Church to get people out of the Church. However, once people see this as a corrupt presentation, I believe it will back fire on those using it, and have the effect of leading people into the Catholic Church. In fact it already has with 82% of Evangelical Protestants Churches going down in numbers and the Catholic Church growing by 14 million last year.
Why would Jesus stop the reenactment of the last supper when He enacted it, for the first time, at the last meeting of His Apostles, before is capture? In fact, Jesus wants us to reenact the Last Supper often. “In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. DO THIS, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me." For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord until he comes” (1 Cor 11:25-26). And so I can believe someone who tells us the Last Supper (Mass) is not Biblical, or I can believe Jesus, who asks us to offer it often.
He said that he was glad that he left the Catholic Church. He did not want to be a part of a church that is unbiblical and heretical. I am convinced that he didn’t realize he was being taught the Bible out of context. He believed that what he was being taught was true. And so he left Biblical Catholic teaching for another tradition whose teachings were unbiblical, heretical and out of context.
only one who uses Jesus words “it is finished,” to try to prove something not in the context. Anything that happens afterward Jesus said these words is (to some) taking away from Jesus one sacrifice. To them it proves “Christ's atonement was insufficient.
Here is a partial list of things that some say are interfering with Christ atonement after Jesus said “it is finished” (Jn 19:30)
- Therefore, the Last Supper (Mass) is wrong;
- Therefore, the Priesthood is wrong;
- Therefore, Confession to a priest is wrong;
- Therefore, the authority of the Church is wrong;
- Therefore, honor (dulia) to Mary is wrong;
- Therefore, the application of good works in salvation is wrong.
The Last Supper, Priesthood, Confession, authority of the Church, honoring Mary and good works are in the Bible and it doesn’t say that any of these things take away from finished work of Christ on the cross. The second problem is that none of these things listed are in the context of John 19:30. We should not take the words of Christ “it is finished” and then use this to negate other things, not in the context. To do so is a corrupt presentation. his type of corrupt presentation is used against the Catholic Church to get people out of the Church. However, once people see this as a corrupt presentation, I believe it will back fire on those using it, and have the effect of leading people into the Catholic Church. In fact it already has with 82% of Evangelical Protestants Churches going down in numbers and the Catholic Church growing by 14 million last year.